Chip Thinking® for data centre design: Enhancing efficiency and reducing risk

How much does he value his love and respect for his children’s right to autonomy?

Important decisions must be based on evidence, and we have to build a shared understanding of the problem and an agreement on the best solution throughout the process.Then at the end of the process, we produce a detailed but understandable account explaining why the proposed solution is the best.

Chip Thinking® for data centre design: Enhancing efficiency and reducing risk

To do this with maximum effect we adopt an integrated design approach and use the latest digital construction technologies..It is the fundamental similarity between complex projects that led us to develop a method that is at once systematic, probing and analytical, and open and engaging in a way that both stimulates and supports a team’s creativity.. We realised that reaching the most efficient version of the most effective solution to their problem in an iterative and collaborative way, is what would truly deliver value to our clients.As design becomes an increasingly automated activity, our role has been to develop a robust framework that focuses on organising the creative steps in the overall design process that are not easy to automate.

Chip Thinking® for data centre design: Enhancing efficiency and reducing risk

These are the steps that require human judgment and interaction with stakeholders.. Design to Value – building on combined strengths.We call this method ‘Design to Value ’.

Chip Thinking® for data centre design: Enhancing efficiency and reducing risk

It focuses on the objectives of our clients and all stakeholders, and combines their expertise in their products or service, with our expertise in design, engineering, modern methods of construction, manufacturing and digital construction technology We use this combined expertise to drive value into the design process..

Although this might sound obvious, it’s a long way from what actually happens in a lot of situations, which aren’t Design to Value led.However, on the day we consciously parked any “solution mode” and the morning was spent discussing barriers: -.

see what we see?”.These can broadly be clustered as follows:.

The perceived immaturity of the state-of-the-art.There is a belief that the technology involved in intensified chemistry is not very mature and therefore carries substantial risk.